Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan
DISTRICT Court for the NMI Magistrate Judge Heather Kennedy issued a warrant of arrest in rem Friday against funds seized from two Bank of Saipan accounts in 2019 for wire fraud and money laundering totaling $310,276.26.
According to an online legal dictionary, “in rem” is Latin for “against the thing,” and “refers to a lawsuit or other legal action directed toward a property, rather than toward a particular person.”
Judge Kennedy issued the warrant of arrest pursuant to “Rule G(3)(b)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.”
She commanded the U.S. Marshals Service and or any other duly authorized law enforcement officer “to arrest and take into your possession the above-captioned defendant properties by serving a copy of this Warrant on the custodian in whose possession, custody, or control the defendant properties are presently found, and to use whatever means may be appropriate to protect and maintain it in your custody until further order of this Court.”
Judge Kennedy issued the warrant of arrest in rem following a verified complaint for forfeiture in rem filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Districts of Guam and the NMI.
Filed on Dec. 30, 2022, the 21-page complaint did not provide the names of the defendants but refers to two Bank of Saipan accounts of “MCS”, which was incorporated by “A.Y.” for the stated purpose of “banking and financial services, real estate development, and business management.”
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, its complaint arises out of an investigation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service of a suspected conspiracy by foreign entities and entities and individuals in the CNMI to commit wire fraud and money laundering.
The suspected conspiracy also aimed “to evade the payment of the proper amount of income taxes owed to the CNMI government, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.”
On Nov. 7, 2019, the FBI executed search warrants at the Office of the Governor, casino investor Imperial Pacific International, and the office of Alfred Yue of Marianas Consultancy Services LLC, among other offices. Marianas Consultancy Services LLC was a consultant of IPI.
You might be interested in:
JUSTICE MANUAL 9-112.000 – Administrative And Judicial Forfeiture | The Debate over Civil Asset Forfeiture | Legislation Introduced to Curb Federal Forfeiture | Data Center Contract Disputes: Litigation vs. Alternative Resolution | What is Civil Forfeiture? | Data Center Cost Optimization Strategies: Balancing OPEX, CAPEX, and Performance | 5G Infrastructure Partnerships: Data Center Opportunities & Legal Risks | Civil Asset Forfeiture Victim Gets His Money Back! | Data Center Transactions: Legal Expertise for Buying, Selling & Leasing | Bennis v. Michigan, Supreme Court OKs Civil Forfeiture | Atlanta Rapper Lost Thousands in Civil Forfeiture, but Fought Back and Won | Data Privacy in the Data Center: A Guide to Compliance | Home, Assets Tied Up For Years As Family Awaits Forfeiture Process | Tackling Data Center Water Conservation | Data Retention Policies: Minimizing Legal Risks for Data Centers | Police keep taking more and more stuff from people without charging them for crimes | Civil Forfeiture Highway Shakedowns in Tennessee | Civil Forfeiture: Legalized Theft by Police & Government | Network Edge & Micro Data Centers: Emerging Legal Challenges | U.S. seeks to seize 280 cryptocurrency accounts tied to North Korean hacks | How Property Owners Can Build a Strong Legal Defense | End Civil Forfeiture of assets Without A Court Order | Civil Forfeiture | Police Can Seize Property Even If the Owner Isn’t Charged | NBC Discusses Need For Civil Forfeiture and How Congress Is Working to Stop Policing for Profit
Additional Reading:
Warrant of Arrest in Rem | Wrongful Property Seizure – Rucci Law | Two Ex-Federal Prosecutors Explain Asset Forfeiture | Paul Padda Podcast | Professional Innocent Owner Defense Attorney Legal Services | Home Asset Forfeiture – Rucci Law | 18 U.S.C. § 981. CIVIL FORFEITURE | Ninth Circuit: Government Cannot Seize Cash Based Solely on Money’s Intended Use | Federal Asset Forfeiture Los Angeles – Rucci Law | Supreme Court says states can’t impose excessive fines, and delivers a win to former heroin addict in pivotal ruling | Taken | WHAT THE SUPREME COURT RULING COULD MEAN FOR CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE | SB 70: Shining More Light on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Senate Seeks New Standard in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Kim Kardashian pays over $1 million to settle SEC charges linked to a crypto promo on her Instagram | Home, Assets Tied Up For Years As Family Awaits Forfeiture Process | Civil Forfeiture: How the Police Can Take and Keep Your Stuff | Civil asset forfeiture is a dangerous tool | Police seized $10,000 of a couple’s cash. They couldn’t get it back — until they went public. | The Impact of Civil Forfeiture Abuse on Innocent Californians | Why Quick Action Is Critical in Forfeiture Defense | End Civil Forfeiture of assets Without A Court Order | Arizona Adopts Landmark Civil Forfeiture Reform Legislation | Airport Pirates Find Bounty in a College Student’s Life Savings | Prosecutorial Discretion in Asset Forfeiture Cases




![skynews-kim-kardashian-reality-tv-star_5918849[1]](https://sebastianrucci.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/skynews-kim-kardashian-reality-tv-star_59188491-180x180.jpg)
![Figure-17[1]](https://sebastianrucci.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Figure-171-180x180.png)




