Two Celebrities Charged With Unlawfully Touting Coin Offerings

Washington D.C., Nov. 29, 2018 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against professional boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and music producer Khaled Khaled, known as DJ Khaled, for failing to disclose payments they received for promoting investments in Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). These are the SEC’s first cases to charge touting violations involving ICOs.

The SEC’s orders found that Mayweather failed to disclose promotional payments from three ICO issuers, including $100,000 from Centra Tech Inc., and that Khaled failed to disclose a $50,000 payment from Centra Tech, which he touted on his social media accounts as a “Game changer.” Mayweather’s promotions included a message to his Twitter followers that Centra’s ICO “starts in a few hours. Get yours before they sell out, I got mine…”

A post on Mayweather’s Instagram account predicted he would make a large amount of money on another ICO and a post to Twitter said: “You can call me Floyd Crypto Mayweather from now on.” The SEC order found that Mayweather failed to disclose that he was paid $200,000 to promote the other two ICOs.

Mayweather and Khaled’s promotions came after the SEC issued its DAO Report in 2017 warning that coins sold in ICOs may be securities and that those who offer and sell securities in the U.S. must comply with federal securities laws. In April 2018, the Commission filed a civil action against Centra’s founders, alleging that the ICO was fraudulent. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York filed parallel criminal charges.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Mayweather and Khaled agreed to pay disgorgement, penalties and interest. Mayweather agreed to pay $300,000 in disgorgement, a $300,000 penalty, and $14,775 in prejudgment interest. Khaled agreed to pay $50,000 in disgorgement, a $100,000 penalty, and $2,725 in prejudgment interest. In addition, Mayweather agreed not to promote any securities, digital or otherwise, for three years, and Khaled agreed to a similar ban for two years. Mayweather also agreed to continue to cooperate with the investigation.

“These cases highlight the importance of full disclosure to investors,” said Enforcement Division Co-Director Stephanie Avakian. “With no disclosure about the payments, Mayweather and Khaled’s ICO promotions may have appeared to be unbiased, rather than paid endorsements.”

“Investors should be skeptical of investment advice posted to social media platforms, and should not make decisions based on celebrity endorsements,” said Enforcement Division Co-Director Steven Peikin. “Social media influencers are often paid promoters, not investment professionals, and the securities they’re touting, regardless of whether they are issued using traditional certificates or on the blockchain, could be frauds.”

The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, is being conducted by Alison R. Levine of the New York Regional Office and Jon A. Daniels, Luke M. Fitzgerald, and John O. Enright of the Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit. The case is being supervised by Cyber Unit Chief Robert A. Cohen.

You might also like:
GDPR vs. CCPA: Comparing Data Center Obligations in Europe and California | Civil Forfeiture Explained by John Oliver on HBO | IRS to return seized cash to small-business owner | Report: Civil Forfeiture Policy Unjustly Deprives People of Property | Defining Roles in Multi-Tenant Data Centers: Clear Boundaries, Less Conflict | Policing For Profit:How Civil Asset Forfeiture Has Perverted American Law Enforcement | Leveraging Insurance Options for Data Center Liability Coverage | Serverless in Data Centers: Contractual, Security, and Scalability Considerations | Kim Kardashian pays over $1 million to settle SEC charges linked to a crypto promo on her Instagram | The Appeals Process in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Streamlining the Permitting Process for Data Center Development | Condo board looks to evict buyer of heavily discounted 1MDB penthouse | Hobby Lobby’s $1.6 million Gilgamesh tablet has been forfeited to the U.S. | Compliance Audits: Preparing Your Data Center for Legal Scrutiny | Navigating Data Center Insurance and Risk Management | Supreme Court Limits Police Powers to Seize Private Property | How Asset Forfeiture Devastates Families and Communities | The Seemingly Interminable Saga of the Timbs Asset Forfeiture Case Continues | Civil Asset Forfeiture: The Police Perspective | FBI gives up attempt to confiscate more than $1 million in California pot-store cash | Understanding Data Center Tier Certifications: Meeting Uptime Requirements | Ending Government’s Civil Asset Forfeiture Theft of Property One State at a Time | Major Ruling On Civil Forfeiture | Asset Forfeiture is Theft: An Overview of the State and Federal Programs