Sanctioned oligarch accuses U.S. of stealing his assets, vows to fight in Russian court

By Alexander Marrow
February 9, 202311:51 AM ESTUpdated a year ago

Summary
This content was produced in Russia where the law restricts coverage of Russian military operations in Ukraine
MOSCOW, Feb 9 (Reuters) – Konstantin Malofeyev, a Russian businessman who is under U.S. sanctions, on Thursday accused the United States of trying to steal $5.4 million of his assets, saying he would file a lawsuit in Russia, where his rights are protected.

U.S. prosecutors may confiscate $5.4 million belonging to Malofeyev, a judge in New York ruled last week, paving the way for the funds to potentially be used to help rebuild Ukraine.

00:01

02:10
The ruling marked the first forfeiture order for a Russian oligarch’s assets since the Department of Justice launched a task force in March last year aimed at squeezing the finances of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s allies after Moscow sent troops into Ukraine.

Malofeyev said his lawsuit in a U.S. court should be called “Malofeyev v The United States”.

“But such a lawsuit is impossible there: there is no justice in the U.S.,” he wrote on Telegram. “None of the robbed investors can defend their rights there.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report this ad
Since Malofeyev did not contest the forfeiture request, prosecutors last week said the funds should be forfeited by default.

“I, as a citizen of Russia, a state with a thousand-year history of justice, will not file a lawsuit in an American court,” Malofeyev said. “Our laws are designed to protect our rights and I will apply to the competent authorities where I live.”

It was not clear whether a ruling in Malofeyev’s favour in a Russian court would have any impact on the U.S. case.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report this ad
U.S. authorities have accused Malofeyev, the owner of Christian Orthodox television channel Tsargrad TV, of financing separatists in Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014.

Malofeyev, who has denied financing separatists, was sanctioned by Washington in 2014 and charged with sanctions violations in 2022.

Reporting by Alexander Marrow Editing by Frances Kerry

Additional Reading:
Monitoring Dark Fiber for Data Centers: Legal, Security, and Contractual Aspects | Civil asset forfeiture: I’m a grandmother, not a drug lord. Why can police take my property? | Michigan Rolled Back Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Dallas County Member Protests Use of Civil Asset Forfeiture | Urban Reform | Security Best Practices for Remote Data Center Hands: Vetting, Training, and Oversight | Kentucky Man Battles Against Asset Forfeiture Laws | Data Center Expansion: The Legal Implications of Rapid Global Growth | The Heat: US Civil Asset Forfeiture Controversy Part 2 | Decommissioning Outdated Cooling Systems: Environmental Permits and Recycling | Texas Asset Forfeiture Press Conference (Institute for Justice) | Bridging the Talent Gap: Solving the Data Center Skills Shortage | How do you protect your assets from seizures and forfeitures? | Civil Forfeiture Now Requires A Criminal Conviction In Montana And New Mexico | How Policing for Profit Threatens Your Rights (TEDx) | 5G Infrastructure Partnerships: Data Center Opportunities & Legal Risks | Supreme Court Limits Civil Forfeiture – LIVE COVERAGE | Cross-Border Data Transfers: Legal Compliance for Global Data Flow | Sen. Lee Questions ATF Nominee on Civil Asset Forfeiture | In appeals court hearing, judges criticize case of Phoenix police seizing man’s $39,500 | Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas: Where and Why Does It Occur? | Loophole Lets Missouri Cops Keep Millions in Forfeiture Funds (and Away from Schools) | Bank Deposits, Structuring, and Asset Forfeitures | Multi-Cloud vs. Single-Cloud Strategies: Legal, Operational, and Real Estate Implications | Can the Trump Administration Use Asset Forfeiture Funds to Build the Border Wall?