Guy describes the living nightmare of the US government trying to seize his family’s motel
US senators held a hearing this week to talk about reforming a bizarre law that lets authorities seize your property even if you’ve never been charged with a crime.
They heard from a man who knows about this “living nightmare” firsthand.
Russ Caswell, a former motel owner who is in his 70s, told the US Senate about how his local police department in Massachusetts, which was working with the US attorney’s office, tried to seize his family’s motel, all because of a law known as civil-asset forfeiture.
Caswell described the experience as “a living nightmare — brought to us courtesy of the United States government.”
Civil forfeiture lets the government seize cash or property that’s tied to criminal activity, even if the owner of that property was never charged with a crime.
In Caswell’s case, he said, federal agents came knocking on his door in September 2009 because 15 people had been arrested for drug crimes at his hotel during a 20-year period. They said they were going to seize his property.
“I have never been charged with or convicted of a crime my entire life. No one in my family, or any of our employees, has ever been involved in a crime at the motel concerning drugs,” Caswell said in prepared testimony for the Senate on Wednesday. “To us, the forfeiture case seemed ludicrous.”
Under civil forfeiture law, the government has to file a lawsuit “against” property or cash it wants to seize. This leads to funny-sounding lawsuits, like “US v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins.”
Caswell spent three years and borrowed $60,000 to fight the government’s lawsuit against his property. A judge ultimately dismissed the action against Caswell’s hotel in 2013, and he got to keep his property.
The experience took a toll on him, though.
“Immediately, the lawsuit began to drive customers away from our motel,” Caswell said, “and our long-term tenants were worried about their future.”
One problem with civil forfeiture, as Caswell mentioned, is that states and localities that team up with the federal government to seize cash or property often get 80% of the proceeds through a program known as equitable sharing.
“This incentivizes police to seize particular property to obtain a direct financial reward,” US Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), said at the hearing Wednesday. “When this occurs without pursuing a criminal conviction, or even an arrest, the chances rise that the rights of innocent people will be violated.”
You might also like:
Multi-Cloud vs. Single-Cloud Strategies: Legal, Operational, and Real Estate Implications | Warrant of arrest issued against seized funds from Bank of Saipan | Legacy Hardware in Modern Data Centers: Balancing Depreciation & Cyber Risks | U.S. prosecutors seize properties, charge Russian on Ukraine invasion anniversary | Data Center Site Selection in 2025: Navigating Real Estate and Power Challenges | Ensuring Environmental Compliance in Data Center Construction | Hybrid IT Strategies: Legal and Security Considerations for On-Prem, Colo, and Cloud Mix | Senate bill aims to rein in IRS on asset forfeitures | Civil Asset Forfeiture: Unconstitutional As Applied | How Civil Asset Forfeiture Turns Authorities into ‘Bounty Hunters’ | State Officials Squander Millions in Asset Forfeiture Funds | Civil Forfeiture Often Focuses on Profit Instead of Public Safety | Walberg, Paul Introduce Civil Asset Forfeiture Legislation | Edge Data Centers in Rural Communities | The Role of Forfeiture in Federal vs. State Investigations | Three Reasons Trump is Wrong to Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform | Ban on Purchasing Certain Equipment with Equitable Sharing Funds | The World of Civil Asset Forfeitures | Data Center Modular Builds: Easing Compliance & Speed-to-Market in Tight Real Estate | Feds Expand Forfeiture of Cryptocurrency | Behind-the-scenes strife led to CEO Stumpf forfeiting $41 million | Why California Has a Unique Forfeiture Landscape | SPP S4E44: Civil Asset Forfeiture | Global Data Center Market Trends and the Path Ahead
You might be interested in:
Innocent Owner Defense | New Proposal by US Attorney General May Sidestep Florida Civil Forfeiture Laws | Senate Seeks New Standard in Asset Forfeiture Cases | Asset Forfeiture Attorney California – Rucci Law | Airbnb ‘Tenant from Hell’ Who Allegedly Lived Rent-Free for 575 Days Leaves Property | Innocent Owner Defense in Asset Forfeiture: Protecting Your Property Rights | JUSTICE MANUAL 9-119.000 – Asset Forfeiture Approval, Consultation, And Notification Requirements | How a Young Joe Biden Became the Architect of the Government’s Asset Forfeiture Program | FBI Uses “Cute” Propaganda Campaign to Justify Civil Asset Forfeiture | Politician Victim of Civil Asset Forfeiture | How to Protect Your Assets from Seizure with Rucci Law | Civil Forfeiture: Can the Government Really Seize and Take Ownership of My Company’s Assets? | This Week’s Outrage (Which, Again, Touches on Civil Asset Forfeiture) | Civil Asset Forfeiture Used as Leverage by State | Asset Return Negotiation Strategies | Innocent Owner Defense – Rucci Law | Final Administrative Action by Customs and Border Protection | Criminal Forfeiture Defense Strategies | Professional 23 Bar Admissions Attorney Legal Services | Forfeiture Defense Lawyer – Rucci Law | Meet the Texas Lawmaker Fighting Trump on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Asset Forfeiture Defense Strategies | DEA Continues to Seize Money Without Proof of Criminality | Civil asset forfeiture: I’m a grandmother, not a drug lord. Why can police take my property?





![igor-groshev-adobe-stock-140622[1]](https://sebastianrucci.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/igor-groshev-adobe-stock-1406221-180x180.jpeg)
![0x0[1]](https://sebastianrucci.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/0x01-scaled-1-180x180.jpg)




