Civil Asset Forfeiture: Grading the States

Civil asset forfeiture is a unique area of law in which the government charges specific property of being guilty of wrongdoing, rather than a person. Perhaps because the property is accused of wrongdoing, and not the person, governments often place lower standards of proof needed to forfeit the property. The procedures used by the federal government and many state governments creates grave Fourth and Fifth Amendment concerns.

Since 2008, the federal government has regularly brought in over $1 billion a year in forfeiture proceeds. Although most states lack reporting requirements that would allow us to track forfeiture proceeds, those that do report reveal that states regularly bring in millions of dollars each year.

While civil asset forfeiture has been used as a funding source since our country’s founding, the practice has accelerated at the state and local level since the 1980s. With the creation of new taxes (income, sales, property, corporate) civil asset forfeiture should no longer be needed to raise revenue for governments that have plenty of other revenue streams.

In the wake of rising public outcry against abusive civil asset forfeiture laws, states such as Minnesota, New Mexico, and Montana have led the reform movement, and other states such as California, Michigan, and Pennsylvania are in the midst of meaningful discussions about reforms. While this movement is great, more states and the federal government, need to follow their lead and reform their own civil asset forfeiture laws.

With civil asset forfeiture becoming a bigger issue at the state and federal levels, FreedomWorks has released its guide to Grading the States on this important issue. As can be seen by the grades of the states and federal government, there are still plenty of reforms to be implemented before this travesty of justice is corrected.

You might be interested in:
Walberg Champions Amendment to Rein in Civil Forfeiture Abuse | Financial Data Centers: SEC Regulations, FINRA Rules, and Best Practices | NPR Articles on Dirty Money Asset Seizures and Forfeitures | Will the feds bungle billions? | How A Quiet Police Lobbying Campaign Killed Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform In Missouri | FBI Seized $86 Million In Raid On Innocent Americans’ Safe Boxes After Duping Judge For Warrant | Risk Profiling for Data Center Clients: Balancing Privacy and Security Assessments | Edge Data Centers: Unique Regulatory and Legal Challenges | Dallas K-9 Instrumental in Civil Forfeiture of $106,000 at Love Field Airport Despite There Being no Arrest or Crime | Why are innocent people still losing cash, cars and even homes to police? | Civil Forfeiture: Can the Government Really Seize and Take Ownership of My Company’s Assets? | Implementing SOC 2 Type II in Colocation Environments: Steps & Pitfalls | Data Center Robotics Automation | SB 70: Shining More Light on Civil Asset Forfeiture | Mitigating Cybersecurity Risk: A Legal Perspective for Data Centers | Why Asset Forfeiture Cases Are Different From Criminal Defense | Hero Judge Takes on Civil Asset Forfeiture! | As Civil Forfeiture Faces Statewide Reform, Some Departments Are Making Changes Now | Constitutional Challenges to Forfeiture: Protecting Your Rights | Timbs vs. Indiana: Understanding Excessive Fines and Fourth Amendment Rights | Walberg Introduces the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act | Data Center Transactions: Legal Expertise for Buying, Selling & Leasing | Real Estate & Zoning Laws: Building a Data Center Legally | This Week’s Civil Forfeiture Outrage (Tenth in a Series: Baltimore Edition)